An investigation published in the current issue of Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics explores the link between child sexual abuse and inability to express emotions in adulthood.
Alexithymia, a clinical condition typified by a reported inability to identify or describe one’s emotions, is associated with various forms of psychopathology, including depression. Highly alexithymic (HA) outpatients are more likely to be female, less likely to have children and are characterized by more somatic-affective symptoms of depression and interpersonal aloofness.
The Authors of this investigation extended these findings by examining personality traits and childhood sexual abuse history. Participants were 94 depressed patients [57.45% with recurrent major depressive disorder (MDD), 37.23% with single-episode MDD, 5.32% with depressive disorder not otherwise specified] 50 years of age and older recruited from psychiatric treatment facilities in Upstate New York. Individuals completed the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders. Alexithymia was assessed with the 20-item self-report Toronto Alexithymia Scale. Its 3 subscales measure difficulty identifying feelings and distinguishing them from bodily sensations (DIF), difficulty describing and communicating feelings (DDF) and externally oriented thinking (EOT), the latter being a tendency to focus on concrete details of external events rather than on aspects of inner experience. Depressive symptom severity was assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Five personality domains, i.e. neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness and conscientiousness, were assessed with the NEO Personality Inventory. History of childhood sexual abuse was assessed using the Childhood Sexual Abuse subscale of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. A latent class cluster analysis (M-Plus 4.20) was performed on the DIF, DDF and EOT subscales. All 3 indicators favored a 3-cluster solution. This solution identified 3 groups, i.e. low alexithymia (LA; n = 11, 63.64% women), moderate alexithymia (MA; n = 40, 60% women) and HA (n = 43, 60.47% women). The distribution of mood diagnoses, single-episode MDD, recurrent MDD and depressive disorder not otherwise specified was not significantly different among the 3 alexithymic clusters (p> 0.05). The Authors conducted 10 separate multivariate generalized logit regressions; odds ratios were calculated for LA versus HA and MA versus HA class membership. Putative predictors were total BDI-II and the 3 subscales, childhood sexual abuse and the 5 personality domains. Covariates were age, gender and education. The 3 BDI-II subscales as well as the total score significantly distinguished LA and MA from HA. Lower levels of depressive symptoms significantly decreased the odds of HA membership. Odds ratios ranged between 0.32 and 0.94 (p< 0.05).
Childhood sexual abuse distinguished MA from HA; lower levels of childhood sexual abuse decreased the odds of HA membership (p< 0.05). Neuroticism, openness and conscientiousness also distinguished the 3 groups. Low neuroticism decreased the odds of HA membership, with odds ratios ranging between 0.95 and 0.97 (p< 0.01). Low openness and conscientiousness increased the odds of HA membership, with odds ratios ranging between 1.02 and 1.07 (p<0.05).
The HA group in this study was characterized by higher neuroticism and lower openness to experience and conscientiousness, a profile that reflects a distressed personality type, which has been related to poorer health outcomes and general functioning and more psychological distress. A similar personality profile was observed for the MA group, with the notable exception being their above-average levels of agreeableness and openness to experience. Interestingly, the HA group was characterized by more childhood sexual abuse compared to the MA patients. These findings add to the mounting evidence for a relationship between childhood sexual abuse and alexithymia; individuals with a history of childhood sexual abuse may have a reduced capacity to experience emotion in relation to their trauma, and this phenomenon may generalize to experiencing all emotions. Childhood sexual abuse has been found to interfere with the development of emotion regulation and to be related to attachment disturbance. The combination of childhood sexual abuse and alexithymia must be considered in the design and implementation of treatment studies, as these patients are more resistant to treatment (the attachment disturbance makes it more difficult for these clients to engage in a therapeutic relationship) and have slower recovery rates and poorer outcomes. Identifying a patient as alexithymic may suggest a history of early traumatic events which increases the likelihood and severity of depression. Treatment should be tailored to address the depressive symptoms along with the affective experience (identification, differentiation, labelling and management of feelings).
Source:Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics: Topciu, R.A. ; Zhao, X.; Tang, W; Heisel, M.J.; Talbot, N.L.; Duberstein, P.R. Childhood Sexual Abuse and Personality Differentiating High and Low Alexithymia in a Depressed Population. Psychother Psychosom 2009;78:385-387
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Does it discuss cases where the child remembers sexual abuse vs cases where the child was too young to remember sexual abuse and may not know?
It does not make that distinction or address that.
art
Do you know of any studies that do discuss child abuse that is not remembered?
That would be interesting, but, no I don't. I'm not sure how you'd do that...if it is not remembered, then how do you verify it occurred and what is the control group?
art
If social services removed the child for sexual or physical abuse but the child is younger than 2 or 3 then it would be in their records. I know of kids that have documented sexual abuse as infants. Then the dilemma would be if they were told, whether the trauma would occur from the abuse or from being told.....
Doing such research presents a number of problems.
First, is the ethical problem you mentioned.
Second, access to such records, as you suggest, is impossible if the child has been adopted; the records are then sealed by ct. order.
Third, the issue of what is a valid control group is another concern.
I think we are just left with anecdotal and clinical impressions. My experience is that some children have difficulties as a result of what you described, while others don't. There are so many factors that come into play:
The nature and quality of the subsequent parenting, home, and parents,
The nature of the abuse
Other co-morbid issues.
etc.
That makes sense. So many factors are involved in our kids mental health. Thanks for your input. Interesting.
Post a Comment